Legal Opinion

Borbridge v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 9, 1982No. 274-81TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a pro se action to recover income taxes in the amount of more than $2,200, plus statutory interest, for 1976. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that taxpayers are entitled under the refund statute to recover nothing. Plaintiffs have not responded to the Government’s motion, and their time to do so has long expired.

Defendant is correct, and we are barred from allowing any recovery. Section 6511(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that, at best for taxpayers, any credit or refund shall not exceed the amount of the tax (for which refund or credit is paid) paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. YorkUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. CarrollUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  2. Raimo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API