Legal Opinion

Raimo v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 27, 1992No. 92-74 TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(4). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion.

FACTS

In 1985, 1986 and 1987, Mr. Joseph John Spagnuolo, aka Joe Spinell, received wages from which federal income tax was withheld. Mr. Spagnuolo did not file an income tax return for tax years 1985, 1986 and 1987. On January 13, 1989, Mr. Spagnuolo died, and on August 29, 1990, plaintiff, decedent’s sister, was appointed administratrix of Mr. Spagnuolo’s estate by the state of New York. On September…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Hazel Cutler v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Joseph I. Swietlik, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen v. Safran, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Bankers Trust Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murdock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Georgeff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API