Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Crandall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Columbia: James A. Eakin, Judge. This is an action by M. T. Hutchison against Mrs. F. D. Crandall in which a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals. In Banc.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBride

This is a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal. The judgment was rendered May 23, 1916, at St. Helens, Oregon. The proof of service shows that notice of appeal was mailed in Portland on July 22d, directed to defendant’s attorneys at St. Helens. The statute requires service of notice of appeal within 60' days from the date of the judgment: Section 550, L. O. L., as amended by Laws 1913, p. 617. By Section 541, L. O. L., service by mail is deemed complete on the first day after the date of deposit of the notice in the postoffice that the mail léaves such postoffice for the place to which the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McCargar v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API