McCargar v. Moore
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. In Banc. Action by C. A. McCargar and others, copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of MeCargar, Bates & Lively, against L. M. Moore, doing business as L. M. Moore & Co., in which attachment was issued and levied, whereupon defendant executed bond for its release, with the Illinois Surety Company as surety.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. In Banc. Action by C. A. McCargar and others, copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of MeCargar, Bates & Lively, against L. M. Moore, doing business as L. M. Moore & Co., in which attachment was issued and levied, whereupon defendant executed bond for its release, with the Illinois Surety Company as surety. There was judgment for plaintiffs by consent, and upon issuance of execution the Surety Company applied for hearing. From denial of the application the Surety Company appealed, and plaintiffs move to dismiss. Motion to dismiss…
1Opinion
On the Merits.
(171 Pac. 587.)
For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by Mr. Thomas Mannix.
For respondents there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Senn, Ekwall & Recken, with an oral argument by Mr. Frank S. Senn.
Department 2.
BEAN, J.
Counsel for plaintiff and respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. A statement of the facts and- a memorandum of the former consideration of the - motion will be found in 157 Pac. 1107. After a review we see no reason for changing the expression therein recorded as to that part thereof relating to judgment being…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weygandt v. BartleOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Portland & O. C. Ry. Co. v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. Chong BenOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- McCargar v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Hutchison v. CrandallOregon Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.