Legal Opinion
Van Stuyvesant v. Conway
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2023No. 1:03-cv-03856Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CURTIS VAN STUYVESANT, PETITIONER, 1:03-CV-03856 (JLR) -against- MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES CONWAY, AND ORDER RESPONDENT. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: On October 5, 2022, Petitioner Curtis Van Stuyvesant (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed three motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b), Rule 1, and
28 U.S.C. §§ 455(a), 1404(a), requesting various forms of relief in this previously dismissed habeas corpus action. ECF Nos. 82, 84, & 86. For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s motions are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael Lovaglia, Martin Clune and Peter PavlisakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.