Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1956No. [No. 107, October Term, 1955.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appellants moved to strike an enrolled judgment, based on a promissory note, for mistake, surprise, irregularity, deceit and fraud and the court refused the motion without hearing evidence, precipitating the appeal before us.

In January 1953, the plaintiffs below, the appellees here, sued on the promissory note signed by the appellants, William M. Thomas and Frances E. Wood, who later became Mrs. Thomas, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The note was filed with the pleadings. The affidavit of the plaintiffs in support of a motion for summary judgment recited the execution of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baltimore Luggage Co. v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Abell v. Simon ex rel. SimonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. Margos v. MoroudasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Smith v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  5. Kolker v. GornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Williams v. Snyder, Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Rawlings v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Campfield v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API