Legal Opinion
Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 15, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-292 (RWR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Araya Henok brings this action against Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), Shapiro & Burson, LLP (“Shapiro”), and Fannie Mae, challenging the legality of the foreclosure on a property he owned on C Street S.E. in Washington, D.C. (“the property”). After the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings arguing that Henok’s complaint failed to satisfy the pleading requirements under *113Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a claim for relief under Rule 12, Henok moved for leave to amend the complaint.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Austin-Spearman v. AARP & AARP Services Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Coon v. WoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Afram v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Austin-Spearman v. AARP & AARP Services Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.