Legal Opinion
Anderson Industries, Inc. v. Anderson (In Re Anderson Industries, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 19, 1985No. 19-01075PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURENCE E. HOWARD, Bankruptcy Judge.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT — 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) UNIFORM FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE ACT
The debtor-in-possession and its Official Unsecured Creditors’ Committee have brought a complaint against the former shareholders of the debtor’s corporate predecessor, alleging that the transactions by which those shareholders sold their stock violated the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, M.S.A. §§ 26.881-26.893 [M.C.L.A. §§ 566.11-566.23] (1982) (the UFCA). The defendants have filed a mo tion for summary judgment as permitted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McCaslin v. SchoutenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Dunn v. MinnemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wieboldt Stores, Inc. v. SchottensteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Aluminum Mills Corp. Ex Rel. Official Unsecured Creditors Committee v. Citicorp North America, Inc. (In Re Aluminum Mills Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Vadnais Lumber Supply, Inc. v. Byrne (In Re Vadnais Lumber Supply, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Ohio Corrugating Co. v. DPAC, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- Brandt v. Hicks, Muse & Co. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.