Legal Opinion
Colonial Chevrolet Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 2012No. 10-647CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiffs are former owners of Chrysler and GM automobile dealerships. They allege an uncompensated taking of their property rights from the Government’s application of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), 12 U.S.C. § 5211.1 According to plaintiffs, the takings occurred when the Government required Chrysler and GM to terminate dealerships as a condition of obtaining financial assistance. The dealers’ property rights allegedly taken by the Government were franchise contracts, ongoing automobile businesses, and automobile dealer rights under state law.2
*572Defend…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Colonial Chevrolet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- In re Qimonda AGUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.