Legal Opinion

NOSSK, Inc. v. Fitness Anywhere LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 12, 2022No. 5:21-cv-08914Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NOSSK, INC., Case No. 21-cv-08914-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 9 v. FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 10 FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC, et al., INJUNCTION 11 Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 21] 12 13 This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiff NOSSK, Inc. (“NOSSK”) seeking 14 a declaration that NOSSK’s exercise equipment products do not infringe Defendant Fitness 15 Anywhere LLC d.b.a TRX’s (“TRX”)

U.S. Patent No. 8,083,653

(the “’653 Patent”), and that the 16 ’653 Patent is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Maurice BidermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API