United States v. Cannon
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
We granted review to determine whether the appellant was prejudiced by the use of a record of conviction by a summary court-martial to allow additional punishment under SECTION B, paragraph 127c, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition).
In United States v. Booker, 5 M.J. 238 (C.M.A.1977), the Court concluded that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Middendorf v. Henry, 425 U.S. 25, 96 S.Ct. 1281, 47 L.Ed.2d 556 (1976), required rejection of summary court-martial convictions for the purpose of the escalation clause of the cited Manual…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
4Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. RiveraU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. SyroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. SaundersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. SlubowskiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.