Trustees of the Antipœda Baptist Church v. Mulford
Supreme Court of New Jersey
in error.
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinions were delivered,
Ewing, C. J.
This cause comes before us on a writ of error to the Inferior Court of Common Pleas of the county of Salem. The record returned contains a declaration with several counts in assumpsit by John M, against the plaintiffs in error, for work and labor, journeys and attendance, goods, wares and merchandize sold and delivered, and for meat,, drink, lodging and other necessaries, with a general demurrer, and joinder and a judgment in favor of Mulford the plaintiff below. °
The plaintiffs in error insist that this judgment is erroneous and should be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleckner v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Gray v. President of the Portland BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Dunn v. Rector, Wardens, & Vestrymen of St. Andrews ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Hayden v. Middlesex Turnpike Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeLisle v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Progressive Welfare Assoc., Inc. v. MorduchayConnecticut Superior Court · 1939