Legal Opinion
In re Rubin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1965No. 28768PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
The above, captioned debtor, Herman Rubin, filed a Petition for Arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act on February 23, 1965. On that same day, this Court appointed Frank E. Gordon, Esquire, Receiver for the Debtor’s property. At the time of filing the Petition for Arrangement, the debtor was in the wholesale pastry business. The debtor would purchase pastries from various suppliers and resell these pastries to retail outlets through driver-salesmen. The debtor would purchase the pastries from the supplier at a discount and they would then be resold at retail…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RubinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- In re RubinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bell v. Forrest Paschal Machinery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- In the Matter of Herman Rubin, Individually and Herman Rubin as Surviving and Liquidating Partner of Rubin's Pastries, a Partnership, Debtor. Jules Goldstein, Henry Glazer, Philip Abrams, Bernard Kaufman and Joseph BibboCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967