Legal Opinion

In re Rubin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1966No. 28768PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, District Judge.

We have before us the petition of the receivers for review of the decision of the referee denying their citation for civil contempt against some of the debtor’s former driver-salesmen and against its major supplier and certain of its employees for disregarding the Order of Court dated February 23, 1965. i

The long and varied history of this case commenced on February 23, 1965 when the debtor, Herman Rubin, filed a petition for arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act. On that day the court appointed a receiver and on March 9, added a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Converse v. Highway Const. Co. of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. In Re Quick Charge, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1947
  5. In re RubinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re RubinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Bell v. Forrest Paschal Machinery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. In the Matter of Herman Rubin, Individually and Herman Rubin as Surviving and Liquidating Partner of Rubin's Pastries, a Partnership, Debtor. Jules Goldstein, Henry Glazer, Philip Abrams, Bernard Kaufman and Joseph BibboCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API