Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided April 12, 2007No. 14-05-01129-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing. Our opinion dated January 25, 2007 is withdrawn, and we issue this substitute opinion.
A jury found appellant, Charles Scott, guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced him to seventy-five years’ confinement. In four issues, appellant contends the trial court erred by (1) excluding testimony from a witness regarding the complainant’s reputation for untruthfulness, (2) allowing an unlisted witness to provide expert testimony (3) allowing a witness other than the outcry witness to testify…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Osbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Albert Jermain Clifton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Albert Jermain Clifton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Andrew Jamon Session v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Ariel Perez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.