Legal Opinion

Phillips v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-553-8PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BLATT, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b) and Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The action was brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). Defendant’s motion asserts, inter alia, that any failure by defendant’s employees in advising, counseling, and testing plaintiff’s mother during her pregnancy concerning the risks of Down’s Syndrome would not constitute actionable negligence with respect to the plaintiff; that an allegation of “wrongful…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Naccash v. BurgerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API