Legal Opinion
United States v. Berlin
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 28, 1989No. Crim. 89-00007-APublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the defendants’ various substantive motions. After consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following rulings.
I. Collective Motions
There are three motions urged by all defendants (except Lackner): motions to suppress the wiretap tapes, to dismiss the wire fraud counts (10-17 and 18-21), and to dismiss Count 1 (conspiracy) and Counts 26-27 (RICO).
1. Motions to Suppress Fruits of Electronic Surveillance
All defendants argue (1) the original affidavits supporting wiretaps…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Sheldon I. MatzkinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Arch Trading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Strates Shows, Inc. v. Amusements of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Jacobs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. DaleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.