Legal Opinion

Gile v. Optical Radiation Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 3, 1994No. 93-5555UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

This case raises an interesting question of liability which has its origin in the coordinated efforts of the Government and manufacturers of optical medical devices to advance the cause of medical treatment through research, experimentation, and optimum freedom for scientific investigation in the pursuit of that purpose.

In 1981, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for clinical investigation an intraocular lens manufactured by defendant Optical Radiation Corporation (ORC). An intraocular lens (IOL) is a lens intended to replace surgically…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Jennifer Stamps v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. No. 93-5555Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Lewis v. Intermedics IntraocCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API