Legal Opinion

Evansville & Crawfordsville Railroad v. Lowdermilk

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1860PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Vigo Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWoedeu, J.

Smith, the deceased, was killed by a train of cars of the company, while crossing the railroad track npon a public highway, and this suit was brought by his administrator, under the provisions of our statute, to recover , damages.

Trial by jury: verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, a new trial being denied.

On the trial, the Court gave to the jury the following charge, to which exception was taken by the defendant, viz:

“ The proposition that unless the defendant is proved to be in fault no recovery can be had, needs no argument to support it, as it is one which strikes the common sense of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haring v. New-York & Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Park v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  3. President of the Peru v. BradshawIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Sheffield & Herrender v. Rochester & Syracuse Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Terry v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Memphis &. Charleston R. R. v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Hecht v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Haute v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API