Legal Opinion

Vermef v. City of Boulder City

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2003No. 39559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In 1997, extensive flooding occurred in Boulder City, resulting in Boulder City and the State of Nevada declaring a state of emergency. Appellant Paul Vermef claims that his property flooded during the 1997 floods and that the floodwaters caused damage to his front yard, driveway, and garage. Vermef filed a complaint against respondent City of Boulder City, alleging that faulty construction of the drainage channel adjacent to his residence was the proximate cause of the flooding.

Boulder City filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that it is immune from liability under NRS…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Posadas v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Great American Insurance v. General Builders, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nylund v. Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 2001

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. ASAP Storage, Inc. v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. ASAP Storage, Inc. v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API