Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided July 27, 1995Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Becky Lynn State Representative P.O. Box 450 Heber Springs, Arkansas 72543
Dear Representative Lynn:
This is in response to your request for an opinion regarding Act 1025 of 1995. You have presented the following specific question:
Cleburne County uses a paper recording system, a microfilm system, and a computer index system. Does Act 1025 of 1995 prohibit the Clerk from accepting marginal releases after December 31, 1995?
Act 1025 of 1995 prohibits the use of marginal notations "in counties which use other than paper recording systems."
Your question has brought to light an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- American Can Co. v. Russellville Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Routh Wrecker Service, Inc. v. WinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Russellville Canning Co. v. American Can Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. Hempstead CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991