Legal Opinion
McIsaac v. University of Vermont
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 4, 2004No. 03-241PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Grievant Mary Lee Mclsaac appeals an opinion and order of the Vermont Labor Relations Board (Board) which found that the University of Vermont (UVM) did not violate any rules or regulations when it denied her application for tenure. Grievant argues that the Board erred by: (1) incorrectly applying a mixed motive analysis to a sex discrimination claim; (2) failing to require UVM to follow its own procedures; and (3) failing to disqualify a member of the Board because he had previously served as a member and chair of the UVM Board of Trustees. We affirm.
*18¶ 2. The Board made the following…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mairin Doyle Brian Doyle Margaret Doyle v. Arlington County School Board, and Arthur W. Gosling John S. Davis Virginia Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamay v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re John GrismoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- In Re Holland Cannabis, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025