Legal Opinion

Charles R. Riegel and Donna S. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., Docket No. 04-0412-Cv

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 16, 2006No. 104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

451 F.3d 104

Charles R. RIEGEL and Donna S. Riegel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 04-0412-CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: December 15, 2005.

Decided: May 16, 2006.

Allison M. Zieve, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC (Brian Wolfman, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC; Wayne P. Smith, Schenectady, NY, of counsel) for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Michael K. Brown, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA (Richard Bakalor, Quirk and Bakalor, P.C., New York, NY, of counsel) for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: POOLER, KATZMANN,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hirsch v. Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service (In Re Hirsch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API