Dauenhauer v. Devine
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Hoonan. The opinion recites the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
Devine and Dauenhauer, being proprietors of adjoining lots fronting on the Main plaza of the city of San Antonio, entered into an agreement that Devine was “to put up party-walls (whenever he is prepared to build on his lots on Main plaza) with” Dauenhauer, who agreed to give Devine “ one foot of ground, for the purpose of erecting said party-walls, off of his property on the Main plaza,” and “ to pay one-half of the cost of said party-walls.” In case Dauenhauer “ should wish to have plates placed in said party-walls for the convenience of laying joists,” he agreed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Partridge v. . Gilbert and OthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Brooks v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Webster v. StevensThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Anderson v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. DoweTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Merit Management Partners I, L.P. v. Noelke, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Galley v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.