Legal Opinion
Acupuncture Center v. Dunlop
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 1976No. 74-1050PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III.
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
This controversy stems from decisions of the Secretary of Labor1 declining to certify the existence of conditions, set by Section 212(a)(14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,2 which would enable appellee Yann Theresa Kao to remain in the United States as an alien performing labor for appellee Acupuncture Center of Washington. In their suit for declaratory relief, the District Court entered a summary judgment remanding the case for further administrative proceedings,3 and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Acupuncture Center of Washington v. DunlopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Mukadam v. U. S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Mukadam v. US DEPT. OF LABOR, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978