Legal Opinion

Mary Kay Inc v. Keller

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 19, 2023No. 3:20-cv-03675Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARY KAY, INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-3675-X § AMBER KELLER, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court previously enjoined Defendants from selling “poor quality, damaged, expired, or defective” Mary Kay, Inc. (“Mary Kay”) products and required Defendants to “disclose to Mary Kay the contact information and identities of every individual and entity that has provided [Defendants] with Mary Kay products.”1 In spite of those orders, Defendants have continued to sell expired…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Exxon Corporation v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Conan Properties, Inc. v. Conans Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API