Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ferry

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county; Abraham R. Lawrence, Justice. This was an action by John S. Miller, Henry W. Leman, and Benjamin P. Chase against Charles H. Perry, to recover damages for the failure of defendant to deliver certain shares of mining stocks. This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s application to have plaintiffs’ undertaking in attachment-increased.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The attachment was served upon shares of mining stock owned' by the defendant in the Small Hopes Consolidated Mining Company., This service was made by delivering a certified copy of the attachment at the office-of the company, stating-the shares intended to be levied upon. After that, and during the pendency of the suit, the shares depreciated very largely in their market price and value; and it was on this account that the defendant claimed to be entitled to an undertaking in a sufficient sum to include this decrease in value. But the decrease in the value of the shares did not result from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maghee v. KelloggNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. McBride v. Farmers' Branch BankNew York Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Wolf Cigar Stores Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Elsman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Texas Life Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Plessner v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In re Liquidaition of Union Indemnity Insurance of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API