Legal Opinion

McBride v. Farmers' Branch Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order in supplementary proceedings. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.†—Ingraham, J.

—This action was commenced by attachment against the defendants, a foreign corporation. After judgment an execution was issued, and proceedings were taken, under section 294, to reach moneys on deposit in the Ocean Bank to the credit of the defendants.

A motion was made to vacate the order restraining the Ocean *348Bank from paying over the moneys, and to declare the judgment satisfied, and to order a perpetual stay of proceedings on the execution.

This motion was denied at special term, and the defendants appealed to the general term. The grounds of appeal are :

First.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Denvrey v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ballston Spa Bank v. Marine BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  2. South Bend Toy Manufacturing Co. v. Pierre Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Taylor v. FelderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Miller v. FerryNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. In re DawsonNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API