Legal Opinion

Westbrook v. Aultman, Miller & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1891No. 214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the La Grange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

The appellee, a corporation, brought this action against the appellant to recover one hundred and fifty dollars and interest, the price of one Buckeye Folding Binder, sold and delivered by the appellee to the appellant.

The answer was general denial.

The case was tried by a jury, a general verdict was returned for the appellee, with answers to interrogatories submitted by the court, on its own motion, and judgment was rendered on the verdict, over appellant’s motion for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial constitutes the assignment of error.

The evidence is in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Druliner v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Simpson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Harper v. State ex rel. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. DeHart v. AperIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Estes v. Anderson Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. City of Indianapolis v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. First National Bank v. GibbonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Meldon v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API