Legal Opinion

Ex parte Indiana Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1916No. 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PETITION POE WEIT OP PEOHIBITION. Motion for permission to intervene and to make return to rule to show cause. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum opinion by

Me. Chief Justice White,

by direction of the court.

Speaking in a general sensé, on the ground that in an admiralty cause pending in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, one of the judges of that court had, by an order which he was absolutely devoid of jurisdiction to make, permitted more than 270 persons to become co-libelants, an application by the defendant in the cause was made on the sixteenth day of October, 1916, for leave to file a petition for prohibition directed to the judge in question, to prevent the carrying out of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Petition of the Indiana Transportation Company for Writ of ProhibitionSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Frueh v. KupperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API