Torrey v. Pearce
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, filed a quiet title action in the Superior Court. Both sides agreed that the matter was one of law and both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants and this appeal followed.
The various land areas will be referred to as noted on the attached partial tracing of the subdivision of the land involved. This tracing was made for the court from a large copy of the official map of Why Worry Farms Amended. A copy of the plat was included in the record on appeal. Portions of the material…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mott v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Haines v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Crocker v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carney v. HeinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Cottonwood/Verde Valley Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. Cottonwood Professional Plaza ICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Maricopa v. RoveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Torrey v. PearceArizona Supreme Court · 1962