Legal Opinion
Preserver Insurance v. Ryba
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 13, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant East Coast Stucco & Construction, Inc., in an underlying personal injury action entitled Ryba v Almeida, pending in the Supreme Court, Rockland County, under index No. 5926/03, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Smith, J.), entered October 27, 2005, as denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant East Coast Stucco & Construction, Inc., in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Markevics v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- American Ref-Fuel Co. v. Employers Insurance of WausauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Travelers Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Rutledge v. Al. G. Kelly & Miller Bros. CircusNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.