Legal Opinion

Ross v. First Savings Bank of Arlington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 25, 2004No. 02-0697PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue whether Iowa courts have personal jurisdiction over a nonresident participant bank to a participation agreement with a nonresident lead bank involving a pool of retail installment contracts, some of which were entered into by the vendor in Iowa with Iowa residents, in an action by the vendees for breach of the installment contracts. The district court determined it did not have personal jurisdiction over the nonresident participant bank and granted its motion to dismiss. On our review, we affirm the district court.

I. Background Facts and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pillsbury Co., Inc. v. Wells Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LpSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  4. Samir M. Shams v. Sona HassanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Capital Promotions, L.L.C. v. Don King Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API