Legal Opinion

Weigand v. Schmitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that there is a failure to show special circumstances such as to authorize the examination of a witness under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. We think in general the section in its provision for the examinartion of witnesses relates to the examination of individuals and not of corporations. All concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Gillette v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Tomford v. Bodnar Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Capone v. Beards Erie Basin, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API