Legal Opinion
Tomford v. Bodnar Industries, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarcus G. Christ, J.
Motion by plaintiff for an order vacating a notice of examination before trial and quashing a subpoena in connection therewith. The examination sought is one of Riverside Plastics Corporation by its president, Frank J. Nussbaum. The corporation is not a party to this litigation and it is sought to examine it as a witness in behalf of the defendant through the corporation’s president. Plaintiff contends that a corporation may not be examined as a witness and there is authority at hand to support his contention. (Chartered Bank of India, Australia & China v. North Riv. Ins. Co., 136 App. Div.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rubel Corp. v. RosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Chartered Bank of India v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Gillette v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Probate of the Will of EricsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- In re Accounting of KimelmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956