Legal Opinion

Kayne Anderson Capital v. Hill & Frank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 2018No. 01-18-00544-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaura Carter Higley, Justice

Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. sued Hill & Frank, Inc., alleging faulty design and construction of a pool at the top of a parking garage. Kayne Anderson included the affidavit of an engineer to serve as a certificate of merit. Hill & Frank filed a motion to dismiss, alleging the certificate was insufficient. The trial court granted the motion. In its sole issue on appeal, Kayne Anderson argues the trial court erred by granting the motion.

We affirm.

Background

Kayne Anderson hired Hill & Frank as designer and architect for a multi-use space in College Station, Texas. The design included a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Matthew Lippincott and Creg Parks v. Warren WhisenhuntTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. BankDirect Capital Finance, LLC v. Plasma Fab, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jennings, Hackler & Partners, Inc. v. North Texas Municipal Water District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kudela & Weinheimer, L.P. Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart & Associates, Inc. And Robinson & Company Landscape Architecture, Inc. v. Juan De Dios Arriaga, Suni Arriaga, Juan Arriaga, and Herick Arriaga, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
  2. PGAL, Inc. v. Ian Miramon and Caroline Miramon, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2026
  3. PGAL, Inc. v. Ian Miramon and Caroline Miramon, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API