Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit Court

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2003No. Docket 121400Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKelly, J.

I agree that intervening circumstances render moot the issues presented in this case. However, they will arise again and require judicial resolution. Therefore, I agree that the Court should address the issues at this time. I write separately to indicate that I believe that certain of the majority’s findings and its legal analysis are incorrect.

separation of powers—prudential concerns

The complex environment of the trial court requires that we allow chief judges to manage the day-to-day operation of their courts. Judicial Attorneys Ass’n v Michigan, 459 Mich 291, 298-299; 586 NW2d 894 (1998).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API