Legal Opinion

Gould's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

On April 15, 1966, a reviewing board of the Industrial Accident Board adopted a single member’s findings, viz. that Gould received a compensable injury on August 2,1963, that he was totally disabled until October 9, 1963, and that from October 9, 1963, “to date and continuing . . . [he] continues to be partially disabled” (emphasis supplied). The Superior Court on May 25, 1966, recommitted the case to the board “for further findings and rulings . . . [[on the issue] whether an offset against compensation should be allowed the self-insurer [[H. P. Hood & Sons] for the” sums paid to Gould…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pierce's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Strohmeyer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. McLaughlin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Mizrahi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. SieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carter v. Mountain BellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Raymond Harris, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Raymond Harris, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Wilson's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. Gordon's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Niemi v. GenRad, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API