Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wmata

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 18, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-2853Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID W. BROWN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-2853 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Brown initiated this lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court after his two requests for documents from the defendant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), were closed when plaintiff did not accede to defendant’s demand that he clarify his requests. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1, Att. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 6, 9, 25, 27, ECF No. 1-1. In addition,…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API