Legal Opinion · Dissent

Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 16, 2014No. 2013-1468, 2013-1469Published

1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge

The majority reaches its decision by rewriting the fundamental principles of a long established doctrine of statutory construction and by invoking an approach for classification of articles that this court soundly overruled. The majority’s analysis invokes a “sounds right to me” approach that is decidedly at odds with established rules of tariff classification interpretation established by law and followed by this court. For this and other reasons set forth below, I respectfully dissent.

I

When Congress adopted the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) in 1988, it explicitly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API