Legal Opinion

State v. Swales

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 24, 1971No. 516, 517, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

September Term, 1970.]

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

Both sets of appellees here were the beneficiaries of a common pre-trial ruling denying the adequacy of an application for a search and seizure warrant. Both sets of appellees were represented by the same counsel at the hearing below and on appeal. The State of Maryland is the appellant, urging a common ground on both appeals. Because of the unity of the issues, both appeals will be considered together in this opinion.

For approximately a four-month period, encompassing the months of October, November and December, 1968, and January, 1969, three members of the Vice-Narcotic Unit of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hignut v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Peterson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Mason v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Silbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Cuffia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API