State v. Swales
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1970.]
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
Both sets of appellees here were the beneficiaries of a common pre-trial ruling denying the adequacy of an application for a search and seizure warrant. Both sets of appellees were represented by the same counsel at the hearing below and on appeal. The State of Maryland is the appellant, urging a common ground on both appeals. Because of the unity of the issues, both appeals will be considered together in this opinion.
For approximately a four-month period, encompassing the months of October, November and December, 1968, and January, 1969, three members of the Vice-Narcotic Unit of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hignut v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Mason v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Silbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Cuffia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.