Hedge v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Oubtam.
The application is made upon a rule to show cause heretofore granted why the summons and complaint served upon the alleged agent of the two'defendant railroad companies other than the Pennsylvania Railroad Company should not be set aside upon the ground of the invalidity of the service.
Testimony was taken on the rule to- show cause, from which it appears that the plaintiff, a resident of New Jersey, purchased a return ticket to Jacksonville, Elorida, and, while traveling on the line of o-ne of the defendants in the neighborhood of Richmond, Virginia, was injured by the alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Stewart Fruit Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- McLoone v. BruschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glaser v. Pennsylvania RRNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Dodd v. Rahway Valley CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Livingston v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1937
- Travis v. FuquaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951