Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1926No. C-1013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGsaham, Judge

The plaintiff is suing to recover commutation of quarters, light, and heat from November 1, 1921, to June 30, 1922, and for rental allowance from the latter date to the time of his discharge on August 14, 1923. The defendant interposes two grounds of defense, the first being that under the following provision of the act of June 5, 1920, 41 Stat. 977, an Army appropriation act, the plaintiff ceased to be a commissioned officer on December 31, 1920:

“ That the President is authorized to retain temporarily in service, under their present commissions, or to discharge and recommission temporarily…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  2. United States v. PhistererSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  4. Odell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1903
  5. Jaegle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Harte v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API