Legal Opinion

Security Central National Bank v. Williams

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1976No. 76AP-435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

Appellant sued appellee for $3,020.49 claimed to be due on a promissory note which the bank had received by assignment from Art Sales, Inc. Appellee answered denying the indebtedness and further denying that the bank was a holder in due course, alleging fraud as a defense.

The case was tried to the trial court who found that appellant was not a holder in due course and that appellee had a defense applicable against the bank. The court rendered a judgment in favor of appellee. From the judgment of the trial court, a timely notice of appeal was filed, setting forth the following assignments of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcanum National Bank v. HesslerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Funding Consultants, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Provident Bank v. BarnhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. EidingOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Caldwell National Bank v. O'Neil, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API