Legal Opinion

Abston v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM PUTNAM Error to Circuit Court of Putnam County. — J. H. Gardenhike, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mu.. Chief Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiffs in error were arraigned and tried in the circuit court of Putnam county, under an indictment containing two counts. The first charged them with forging a deed purporting to have been signed by one Sam Eastland, and the second with passing this instrument, to the prejudice of the prosecutor J. H. Johnson and,his brother Lewis Johnson. The deed was set out in full in each count, and, according to its terms, described and conveyed a tract of land in Putnam county. The evidence shows that the timber on this land belonged to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. SwetlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Maloney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. DaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Girdley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. BaenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Keebler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Wofford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API