People v. Swetland
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Respondent was convicted of forgery. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
On July 25, 1885, the defendant bought of George W. Parker a piece of land in Kalamazoo county. On the same day she executed a mortgage for $700 to him upon the said land. The theory of the prosecution in this case, as developed on the trial, was that the respondent or some one else forged a discharge of this mortgage, and that she put it on rec*55ord, or caused it to be recorded, and afterwards used the abstract showing said mortgage to be discharged to effect two other loans, — one from D. T. Allen, and the other from Mrs. Amy E. Day.
The respondent was tried and convicted in the Kalamazoo…
2Cited by35 opinions
- People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. KirbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.