Legal Opinion
John Mazor v. Elizabeth Farrell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2018No. 16-PR-1006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLeese, Associate Judge:
Appellants John and William Mazor ("the Mazor brothers") sued their father Julian Mazor ("Mr. Mazor") and their father's second wife, appellee Elizabeth Farrell, to recover funds misappropriated from the estate of their grandmother Esther Mazor. The trial court found Ms. *831 Farrell liable to the Mazor brothers for unjust enrichment of over $300,000. In the present appeal, the Mazor brothers challenge the trial court's decision that they were not entitled to prejudgment interest on that award under D.C. Code § 15-108 (2012 Repl.) (in action to recover "liquidated debt on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- News World Communications, Inc. v. ThompsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vereen v. ClayborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- District of Columbia v. CampbellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Hirani Eng'g & Land Surveying, P.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- American Civil Construction, LLC v. Hirani Engineering & Land Surveying, PcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- May v. River East at GrandviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Parker v. U.S. Trust Company N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.