Legal Opinion

Erlich v. Heis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. C. B. Smith. Action by George Heis against Sam Erlich and another for damages for the death of his child, caused by an automobile. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Sam Erlich appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*670This case was submitted and decided under the new rule 46, and the opinion of the court was rendered by Mr. Chief Justice Anderson.

The plaintiff sued Sam and Julian Erlich jointly for the wrongful death of his minor daughter, and recovered a judgment against both of the defendants. This appeal is taken by Sam Erlich alone, who insists that he .was entitled to the general charge, for the reason that he was in no way connected with the death of the intestate, and was not in law responsible for the conduct of his son Julian, as he was going upon a journey in pursuance of his own business,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Armstrong v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Blair v. BroadwaterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  3. Kelly v. HanwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Cohen v. MeadorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API