Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Vano

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 30, 2012No. Criminal No. 2011-0352Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Case No. 11-cr-352 (BAH) SANFORD LTD., et al., Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this maritime case, three Defendants – Sanford Ltd. (“Sanford”), a shipping company that owns and operates the fishing vessel San Nikunau; and two individuals, James Pogue and Rolando Ong Vano, who served at different times as the Chief Engineer of the ship – are charged with violating federal criminal laws related to their alleged discharge of oil-contaminated sludge and bilge waste into the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Mejia, RafaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. MahdiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  5. United States v. MuyetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API