Legal Opinion
Perez v. Colvin
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided September 30, 2016No. Case No. 5:15-cv-01037-TMPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The plaintiff, Edwin Omar Perez, himself a former employee of the Social Security Administration, appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying his application for a period of *1203disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). Mr. Perez timely pursued and exhausted his administrative remedies and the decision of the Commissioner is ripe for review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). The parties have consented to the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Renee S. Phillips v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Billy D. Crawford v. Comm. of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodriguez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Johnson v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Rodriguez v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018